Sunday, May 31, 2009

HEY DEMOCRATS got 280K to spare (Washington)

That what the estimate is for the dinner OBAMA& wife had in new york.....................WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!................can anyone that isn't crazy please explain why this is allowed to continue.......Even the sheep have to be awake sometime................and before you even start to justify this unneeded expense that is the costs(low) of the extra protection jet fuel ect ect ect.........not to mention the wear and tear on OUR government property............OH I guess if PELOSI can fly coast to coast every week OBAMA should be able to fly wherever and whenever JUST FOR FUCKING DINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PLEASE TRY TO STAND UP FOR THIS............YOU IDIOT'S 
 

The Obama administration ignores voter intimidation

EDITORIAL: Protecting Black Panthers

The Obama administration ignores voter intimidation

By | Friday, May 29, 2009
  • Bookmark and Share

Imagine if Ku Klux Klan members had stood menacingly in military uniforms, with nightsticks, in front of a polling place. Add to it that they had hurled racial threats and insults at voters who tried to enter.

Now suppose that the government, backed by a nationally televised video of the event, had won a court case against the Klansmen except for the perfunctory filing of a single, simple document - but that an incoming Republican administration had moved to voluntarily dismiss the already-won case.

Surely that would have been front-page news, with a number of firings at the Justice Department.

The flip side of this scenario is occurring right now. The culprits weren't Klansmen; they belonged to the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense. One of the defendants, Jerry Jackson, is an elected member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee and was a credentialed poll watcher for Barack Obama and the Democratic Party when the violations occurred. Rather conveniently, the Obama administration has asked that the cases against Mr. Jackson, two other defendants and the party be dropped.

The Voting Rights Act is very clear. It prohibits any "attempt to intimidate, threaten or coerce" any voter or those aiding voters.

The explanation for moving to dismiss the case is shocking. According to the Department of Justice: "These same Defendants have made no appearance and have filed no pleadings with the Court. Nor have they otherwise raised any other defenses to this action. Therefore, the United States has the right ... to dismiss voluntarily this action against the Defendants." In other words, because the defendants haven't tried to defend themselves, the Justice Department won't punish them.

By that logic, if a murderer doesn't respond to the charges, he should be let free. That's crazy.

The Obama Justice Department did take one action against one of the four defendants: It forbade him from again "displaying a weapon within 100 feet of any open polling location" in Philadelphia. Given that it already was illegal to display a weapon at a polling place and that he was not even enjoined from carrying a weapon at polling places outside of Philadelphia, it is hard to see what this order accomplished.

We asked the Justice Department if it was unable to provide any explanation for dropping the case. Justice press aide Alejandro Miyar merely said: "That is correct." Multiple times we asked both the department and the White House to comment on charges that the dismissals represented political bias. We received no substantive response.

Hans Von Spakovsky, a legal scholar at the Heritage Foundation and a former commissioner at the Federal Election Commission, tells us, "In my experience, I have never heard of the department refusing to take a default judgment... . If a Republican administration had done this, it would be front-page news and every civil rights group in the country would be screaming about it."

Consider that the behavior of the defendants was so bad that witness Bartle Bull, a former Robert F. Kennedy organizer who did extensive legal work on behalf of black voters in Mississippi, testified it was "the most blatant form of voter discrimination I have encountered in my life."

Eric Eversole, a former litigation attorney with the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, told us: "It is truly unprecedented for the Voting Section to voluntarily dismiss a case of such blatant intimidation. The video speaks for itself."

We couldn't agree more. After the 2000 Presidential election, Democrats complained about voter intimidation in Florida by pointing to a police car that had been two miles away from a polling place. The police didn't do anything to anyone, but their presence was deemed sufficient to vaguely intimidate people en route to the polls. In this case, the New Black Panther Party actually blocked access to a poll.

Unlike the Florida incident, this case involving the New Black Panthers screams out for tough justice. Instead, the Obama administration looks the other way. This all but invites racial violence at future elections.


 
"I regret that I have but one life to lose for my country."Captain Nathan Hale, a 21-year old officer in the Continental Army, uttered those famous words upon his execution at the hands of British forces. http://keepthechangepalin2012.blogspot.com/

WTF? MICHELLE OBAMA ON "COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS"

WTF? MICHELLE OBAMA ON "COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS"

First off, the biggest ass-kissing media refers to Michelle Obama as a 'distinguished attorney" despite the fact that Michelle Obama has been"inactive" since 1993. Click here: ARDC | Lawyer Search

ARDC - Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
!Michelleobamaardcrecord

Click to enlarge image. Everyday another Obama skeleton comes careening out of the closet.

This ADRC is for discipline reasons...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. It is COURT ORDERED...not "Michelle Obama ordered." Their website is very clear about their function and why they step in. (see below)

If this was a Republican, the Democrooks would have her up on charges already.

Schmoo, an attorney, points out, "sounds more to me like she was drummed right out of the practice of law. I am just dying to know what she did... she ran to have a court ordered inactive status done...and then no malpractice report needed to be provided.

She wanted this to 'go away" fast and furious and the details not come out in depositions, courtroom documents, rulings for the client/plaintiffs...etc..

I would love to know what she did. I believe barack obummer himself was also disciplined--I know his law license is on "inactive" he lied about ever going by any other names when he applied for bar application. He also failed to state any prior drug use...(which he admitted in his books...and he had outstanding tickets that were never paid)."

Michelle Obama on court ordered inactive status with the Illinois State Attorney hat tip schmoopett

huh?

  Michelle Obama is on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS--order said since she has been placed INACTIVE that "no malpractice record required."

WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?

What Is the ARDC? (this is NOT the Illinois Bar-where one can voluntarily be inactive) As our name implies, the ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.

Our principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer's fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, we will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely).

We cannot impose fines, imprison, obtain monetary damages, enforce remedies between the lawyer and client, or seek civil or criminal relief against a lawyer as part of the disciplinary process. We can affect only the lawyer's ability to practice law in Illinois.

We are not funded by taxpayers' money. We are funded entirely by the annual registration fees paid by attorneys authorized to practice law in Illinois.

What Is a Request for an Investigation of an Attorney?

It is a request to us that we look into the conduct of an attorney who you believe has acted improperly. We will review your request to determine if an investigation is warranted. In most cases, we will initiate an investigation where the information you provide us suggests that the attorney engaged in illegal, dishonest or unethical conduct. Filing a request accusing an attorney of unethical conduct is a serious matter to the lawyer. We recommend that, whenever practical, you try to resolve any differences or disputes that do not concern claims of unethical conduct directly with the lawyer.

How Do I Request an Investigation of an Attorney?

By mailing to our office, either in Chicago or Springfield, a request that you want an attorney to be investigated by our office. Your request should be in writing. No special form is necessary. For your convenience, you may download a Request for Investigation form. Please return the Request by postal mail or hand-delivery. The ARDC does not accept an e-mail transmission of a Request for Investigation.

UPDATE: Scmoo the attorney adds:

as an attorney I am telling you that people can "choose" to not pay their registration fees or take their continuing education of the bar and therefore go on "suspension...or inactive status
that goes thru the CAL BAR--the California Bar association

UPDATE: What was little Michelle from the Southside of Chicago doing in 1993?

1993: Public Allies Chicago with 30 Allies is launched by founding Executive Director Michelle Obama. President Clinton names Public Allies a model for national service. First Lady Hilary Clinton hosts Rose Garden reception for Public Allies at the White House.

Say what? Michelle and Hillary go back that far?

Shmoo finds more:

In 1992 Michelle Obama  left her job at Sidley Austin to launch a career in public service, serving as an assistant to Mayor Daley and then as the assistant commissioner of planning and development for the City of Chicago.
(ask yourself how did a 2-3 year attorney...just wound up being Mayor Daleys "assistant" just like that...and what did she do as an "assistant"  what does that even mean when you are a harvard trained attorney?)

Too close for comfort.  Coincidental?

Bernardine Dohrn, Bill ayers wife was at Sidley Austin--- a law firm in Chicago from From 1984 to 1988. Dohrn was employed by the law firm Sidley Austin although her criminal record has prevented her from being admitted to either the New York or Illinois bar. (source: wikipedia)


Fw: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: MSU


 

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: ken kropacek <kropacek@yahoo.com>
To: wildojim@aol.com; jmora@chapman.edu; cpthookis@yahoo.com; nick2barbara@hotmail.com; maimperl@yahoo.com; stankan@chapman.edu; lives9meow@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 3:33:57 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: MSU



--- On Fri, 5/29/09, Thomas Wysoglad <granpat8@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Thomas Wysoglad <granpat8@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: MSU
To: "STAN AKSAMIT" <velvet6gt@msn.com>, "Gerald Aksamit" <gfa62retired@yahoo.com>, "Bruce" <hammer_b@sbcglobal.net>, "Joyce Kropacek" <jkropacek@exchange.fullerton.edu>, "ken kropacek" <kropacek@yahoo.com>, "Pat & Jim Lantvit" <patjiml@sbcglobal.net>, "Bryan Ogren" <ogeewon@juno.com>, "Michelle Piotrowski" <micpiot@yahoo.com>, "Rob Wysoglad" <wyso33@yahoo.com>, "Michael Wysoglad" <soglad2@aol.com>, "Michele Wysoglad" <pnutsoglad@yahoo.com>, "Scott Wysoglad" <soglad4u@comcast.net>, "Tom Wysoglad" <momofboyz2@yahoo.com>, "Charles Wysoglad" <FISHMANCHUCK@ME.COM>
Date: Friday, May 29, 2009, 11:28 AM



--- On Tue, 5/19/09, Rose Marie Little <tusadove3@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Rose Marie Little <tusadove3@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: MSU
To: granpat8@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:59 AM



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <Floridapop@aol.com>
Date: Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: MSU
To: maula2424@sbcglobal.net, Duane@acwarehouse.com, flapamara@aol.com, GGGIZ@aol.com, bcheckman@gmail.com, davenkara@bigfoot.com, lvgpaof4@embarqmail.com, Stacyclem@aol.com, repairtch@verizon.net, KayserMed@aol.com, pinkii58@att.net, cabin_29@hotmail.com, Almar7212@msn.com, flyguy721@earthlink.net, tusadove3@gmail.com, mkmcla@aol.com


 
 

From: Bob bob 99
To: locopoyodiablo@yahoo.com, diane@boettcher.com, ddugan1@twcny.rr.com, wdugan1@twcny.rr.com, mayor-george1@juno.com, Floridapop, Jdadnd55, r4477b@comcast.net, elbart@verizon.net, SWEENEYMK
Sent: 5/18/2009 9:28:31 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: MSU
 
 
 

From: hpcolombo@wowway.com  & BOB DSent: 5/17/2009 9:36:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Fw: Fwd: MSU
 
 
I think it is great that this professor had enough guts to speak up.  And if their is freedom of speech, then why when a Caucasian American speaks  up the establishment wants to fire and condemn this person.  It is ok for every other race or nationality to speak up except if you are white.  Way to go professor.
Pat
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Very interesting; the University is standing by their professor and not bowing down to special interest groups!  
 
 
Professor Wichman E-mail
Claim:  A  Michigan  professor sent an e-mail telling Muslim students to leave the country.  

Status: 
  True.
The story begins at  Michigan   State   University
with a mechanical engineering professor named
Indrek Wichman.
Wichman sent an e-mail to the Muslim Student's Association.
The e-mail was in response to the students' protest
of the Danish cartoons
that portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist.
The group had complained the cartoons were
'hate speech'
============
Enter Professor Wichman.
==========================================
In his e-mail, he said the following:
===============================
Dear Moslem Association,
As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU
I intend to protest your protest.
I am offended not by cartoons,
but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians,
cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders,
murders of Catholic priests
(the latest in  Turkey),
burnings of Christian churches,
the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in  Egypt ,
the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims,
the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women
(called 'whores' in your culture),
the murder of film directors in  Holland,
and the rioting and looting in  Paris, France.
This is what offends me,
a soft-spoken person and academic,
and many, many of my colleagues.
I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal,
and uncivilized slave-trading Moslems
to be very aware of this as you proceed
with your infantile 'protests.'
If you do not like the values of the West
- see the 1st Amendment -
you are free to leave.
I hope for God's sake
that most of you choose that option .
Please return to your ancestral homelands
and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.
Cordially,
I. S. Wichman
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
=============================
As you can imagine,
the Muslim group at the university didn't like this too well.
They're demanding that Wichman be reprimanded
and the university impose mandatory diversity training for faculty
and mandate a seminar on hate and discrimination for all freshmen.
Now the local chapter of CAIR has jumped into the fray .
CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations,
apparently doesn't believe that the good professor
had the right to express his opinion.
==========
For its part,
the university is standing its ground
in support of Professor Wichman,
saying the e-mail was private,
and they don't intend to publicly condemn his remarks.
============================================================
Send this to your friends, and ask them to do the same.
Tell them to keep passing it around until the whole country gets it.
We are in a war.
This political correctness crap is getting old and killing us.
==================
If you agree with this,
please send it to all your friends,
f not simply delete it.


An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!
 
http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=109095&rui=107589921


A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!


A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps!




"We're no longer a Christian nation." President Barack Obama

 

"We're no longer a Christian nation."
-- President Barack Obama

If it concerns you that President Obama is telling Americans that we are "no longer a Christian nation," I hope you will join me in launching a very special campaign to reclaim our Judeo-Christian heritage.

The evidence is clear that our Founding Fathers built our nation on biblical principles.

In fact, I've written a book about it that I would like to send you.

I'll tell you more about that in a minute...

But first, I need you to SELECT HERE if you agree that we need to bring the morals of our Founding Fathers back to government.

I think you know where I stand.

Like President John Adams, I believe that "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

But Obama radicals are willfully ignoring the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion.

For instance, far-left judges are ordering the Ten Commandments out of courthouses.

A legal battle to remove "In God We Trust" from U.S. currency is underway in the courts.

And Obama's administration is reversing the "Conscience Rule" to protect doctors and nurses who refuse to perform abortions due to religious reasons.


That's not what our Founding Fathers intended by separation of church and state.

But don't take just my word for it.

The evidence that our Founding Fathers built America on Judeo-Christian principles is written on nearly every building, memorial and monument in our Nation's Capital.

In my search for proof, I found biblical scripture engraved on some of the most important buildings in Washington, D.C.

For example, did you know that:
  • "The heavens declare the glory of God" (Psalm 19:1) is engraved on a wall of the Library of Congress.

  • A sculpture of Moses with the Ten Commandments appears over the east portico of the Supreme Court.

  • "Holiness to the Lord" is engraved into a tribute block of the Washington Monument.

  • And a heartfelt prayer from President John Adams is carved into the stone fireplace in the White House State Dining Room: "I pray to heaven to bestow the best of blessings on this house and all that hereafter inhabit it."
These are just a few of the many examples of Judeo-Christian imagery you'll find in our Nation's Capital.

Tourists visiting Washington, D.C. see them every day.

Yet Barack Obama lives in the White House... and pretends they aren't there.

In fact, buried inside Obama's trillion-dollar stimulus package is anti-Christian legislation that will stop churches from using public schools for meeting on Sundays, as well as Boy Scouts and student Bible study groups.

Perhaps someone should remind Barack Obama that members of Congress used to hold church services -- right in the U.S. Capitol building!

My friend, that someone is you and me.

Americans of faith need to know what's at stake.

That's why I founded "Renewing American Leadership" -- and why I need you to SELECT HERE if you agree that we need to bring the morals of our Founding Fathers back to government.

Since I left Congress, I've been working to bring moral leadership back to our nation.

One way is through my new organization, Renewing American Leadership. By working with pastors across the nation, ReAL is training a new generation of leaders who will bring Christian values with them to Congress.

Our Founding Fathers lived by those same values -- in fact, they prayed openly for our nation and even declared national days of prayer and fasting.

If you believe our nation could use more biblical values in our government, then I hope you will SELECT HERE to make your very best gift of $35, $50, $100, or even $500 to Renewing American Leadership today.

Your gift is tax-deductible. And in appreciation of your contribution of $35 or more, I will send you a copy of the book I mentioned earlier, Rediscovering God in America.

I wrote Rediscovering God in America to prove that our Founding Fathers clearly built this nation on Judeo-Christian values. Now you and I must tell millions of Americans that the proof is engraved in stone all over our Nation's Capital!

My friend, these are dangerous times for our nation and I'm counting on Americans of faith -- like you –- to support Renewing American Leadership.

If you disagree with Barack Obama's claim that "we are no longer a Christian nation," then please accept my invitation and SELECT HERE to make your tax-deductible donation of at least $35 to Renewing American Leadership today... and receive YOUR copy of Rediscovering God in America.

Our Founding Fathers weren't ashamed to declare their faith in public -- and we shouldn't be either!

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich 

 
"I regret that I have but one life to lose for my country."Captain Nathan Hale, a 21-year old officer in the Continental Army, uttered those famous words upon his execution at the hands of British forces. http://keepthechangepalin2012.blogspot.com/

TOP TEN REASONS SOTOMAYOR WON'T BE CONFIRMED (& how to stop her)


 TOP TEN REASONS SOTOMAYOR WON'T BE CONFIRMED (& how to stop her)

I generally support the idea of nominating a woman or a Hispanic to the U.S. Supreme Court, but not this one, not Judge Sonia Sotomayor. And she's so biased, that I'll go out on a limb to predict she won't be confirmed, for ten reasons: 

10) SOTOMAYOR: ADMITS MAKING ACTIVIST POLICY FROM THE BENCH

In a 2005 panel discussion at Duke University, Sotomayor told students that the federal Court of Appeals is where "policy is made." She said the "Court of Appeals is where policy is made. And I know, and I know, that this is on tape, and I should never say that. Because we don't 'make law,' I know. [audience laughter] Okay, I know. I know. I'm not promoting it, and I'm not advocating it. I'm, you know. [audience laughter] Having said that, the Court of Appeals is where, before the Supreme Court makes the final decision, the law is percolating. Its interpretation, its application."  As a judicial activist, she jokingly admits "making policy" from the bench, based on feelings or empathy or judicial precedent, not laws passed by Congress, and so she assumes the power of legislature, to make policy, legislating from the bench. 

9) SOTOMAYOR: PRO-ABORTION-SUPPORTS ROE V. WADE

Although she ruled to uphold the longstanding "Mexico City Policy" which had limited funds for abortions performed overseas (until President Obama struck down that policy, now fully funding abortions overseas with our taxes), Sotomayor stands squarely in the camp of supporting and upholding the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized child killing across America and cost 50,000,000 children their lives.

Furthermore, Rev. Rob Schenck of The National Clergy Council now reports that Sotomayor was or is an active board member of a group called the "Childbirth Connection" that advocates for "reproductive rights of women," which is generally a code word for abortion on demand, including partial birth abortion, which Sotomayor has never publicly opposed.  Since I was born to a single mom who courageously gave me up for adoption, and I was adopted at age three by a Christian family, I'm passionately pro-life.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
 
8) SOTOMAYOR: ANTI-GUN, ANTI-WEAPON, ANTI- 2nd AMENDMENT

In her ruling to allow government to ban privately owned weapons belonging to New York citizens, Sonia Sotomayor wrote in Maloney v. Cuomo: "The Second Amendment applies only to limitations the federal government seeks to impose on this right . . . not upon that of the state." Since her crazy reading of the 2nd Amendment only forbids Congress from seizing your guns, the New York State Assembly was fully authorized to ban nunchuks, or seize ANY AND ALL of your weapons, according to Sotomayor's anti-liberty reasoning.  But as a former military distinguished marksman and former captain of my rifle team at a New York State high school, I care about protecting our right to bear arms. 

7) SOTOMAYOR: ANTI-TEN COMMANDMENTS, BUT PRO-MUSLIM?

ACLJ Attorney Jay Sekulow said of Sotomayor: "She is left in judicial philosophy, ranges much further left than Justice Ginsburg or Justice Souter . . . I just had a case where the Court was unanimous, it was involving the 10 commandments issue, and the court was unanimous 9 to 0, but I would not expect that if Judge Sotomayor was confirmed, that it would probably have been 8 to 1.  She has a very, very strict view of church-state separation, and she was aggressive on this idea of a 'living constitution.'"  Meanwhile she ruled one Muslim prisoner had a right to receive the Eid ul Fitr feast (a Muslim holiday meal) in his prison cell, and another Muslim prisoner had a right to access a Muslim chaplain, which is fine if she treats other faiths equally.  But I personally suspect Sotomayor would rule to
disallow public prayers offered "in Jesus name" but allow prayers to Allah, just like Obama's other judicial nominee David Hamilton.

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)

6) SOTOMAYOR:  SAVIOR OF THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF WOMEN

NOW President Kim Gandy quickly endorsed Sotomayor, saying: "This morning we will celebrate, and this afternoon NOW will launch our 'Confirm Her' campaign to ensure the swift confirmation of the next Supreme Court Justice."  There's no way this liberal group would endorse Sotomayor unless she were pro-lesbian and pro-abortion, as Gandy openly advocates on the NOW web-site. 

5) SOTOMAYOR: OVERRULED 33 OF 44 VOTES BY SUPREME COURT

Sotomayor has had 5 decisions reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court, 3 of which have been reversed.  One of these was her aggressive pro-environmental anti-energy decision, another was her aggressive pro-litigation anti-business decision, which was overturned unanimously.  She has carried only 11 of 44 possible votes during those cases.  Chief Justice Roberts once stated that her method of reading the statute in question "flies in the face of the statutory language." Dean Mat Staver of Liberty Law School cites these reasons to oppose Sotomayor, saying, "No one ever expected President Barack Obama to nominate someone who respects the original intent of the Constitution." 

4) SOTOMAYOR: FAVORITISM BY RACE OR GENDER, NOT LAW

Sotomayor told the Berkeley Law School: "Our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging . . .I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."  It is no surprise, therefore, she ruled against white Firefighters of New Haven, throwing out the results of a promotion exam because almost no minorities qualified.  She denied promotion for the white firefighters who performed well on the exam, and gave minorities who failed the exam favorable consideration toward promotion.  Sotomayor promotes aggressive affirmative action, promoting race or gender, not merit.   The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed this case in April 2009, and is expected to overturn her again. 

3) SOTOMAYOR: FAVORS INTERNATIONAL LAW OVER AMERICAN LAW

Opposing a U.S. Congressional bill that would forbid activist judges from citing international law (instead of applying American law) in their decisions, Sotomayor wrote the controversial introduction for The International Judge, a book that promotes, in her words, "developing an international rule of law and institution-building" and idealizes the "pioneers who work tirelessly to bring these institutions from their incipience to their maturity."    No doubt she will vote with Justice Ginsberg, who believes American judges should sometimes look toward international law rather than the U.S. Constitution. 

PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 99 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER JUDGE SONIA SOTOMAYOR.  (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)

2) SOTOMAYOR:  EVEN THE LIBERALS CALL HER A BULLY

Her own former clerk, liberal Jeffrey Rosen, now legal affairs editor for The New Republic, said she has "has an inflated opinion of herself" and is "kind of a bully on the bench." Another clerk who worked on the 2nd Circuit said she's: "not that smart and kind of a bully on the bench . . .She has an inflated opinion of herself, and is domineering during oral arguments, but her questions aren't penetrating and don't get to the heart of the issue."

1) SOTOMAYOR: BASEBALL BIAS FOR NEW YORK YANKEES!

As a native of South Bronx, Sotomayor's hidden home-town bias became manifest in her love for the New York Yankees, judicially favoring her "Bronx Bombers" over teams from all other cities.  No kidding!  When ruling to end the 1995 baseball strike, she sided with the player's union against team owners (who sought parity among all teams with an talent-sharing salary cap).  Instead Sotomayor created bias in favor of rich teams who can afford to buy up all the good free agents.  So when the New York Yankees hogged 4 titles and 6 pennants in the 8 years after her ruling, with payrolls averaging three times most other team salaries, you can blame Sotomayor for creating that competitive imbalance.  I understand why Yankees fans might celebrate her promotion to the Supreme Court, but baseball fans from all other cities should complain loudly against her confirmation! 

"I regret that I have but one life to lose for my country."Captain Nathan Hale, a 21-year old officer in the Continental Army, uttered those famous words upon his execution at the hands of British forces. http://keepthechangepalin2012.blogspot.com/

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Warning picture of the most evil women in America

" I get your constitution and your bill of rights my pretty"
 
"Bow to my glory pesents"

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Fw: Finally, Something For The Rest Of Us


 






--- On Tue, 5/26/09, Wildojim@aol.com <Wildojim@aol.com> wrote:



 
Subject:  Finally.....something for the REST of us

 
 

First came the commemorative coins, then the T-shirts, then the plates, and now, something for the rest of us!....
  


 
 
 

 



a conseervation

Parody of a scean from Team America World Police
 

Palace Guard Mr Ill Barry Hussien from great satan is here to see you

 

Mr Ill --Barry Hussein o no Barry great to see you

 

Barry hussein---Mr Ill we were trying to inspector you country for weapons of mass destruction but you guards wont let me

 

Mr Ill--- Barry Barry Barry we have been over this over and over we dont have any weapons of mass destruction

 

Barry Hussein--- Than Mr Ill let me see all of your country or else

 

Mr ILL ---- Or else what

 

Barry Hussein---We will write you a letter and tell you how angery we are with you in the letter

 

Mr. Ill ok ok you ready to see them a little to the left a little more right there (Mr ill opens a trap door and barry hussein falls into a shark tank) There you Barry Hussein you fING c@@@@ s###### how do you like those weapons

 

 

 

"I regret that I have but one life to lose for my country."Captain Nathan Hale, a 21-year old officer in the Continental Army, uttered those famous words upon his execution at the hands of British forces. http://keepthechangepalin2012.blogspot.com/


This is a new low Liberals

Supervisor Asks Woman To Take Down American Flag

MANSFIELD (CBS 11 News) ― Is it okay to show your patriotism at the office?

For one Arlington woman, the answer was "no" after she hung an American flag in her office just before the Memorial Day weekend.

Debbie McLucas is one of four hospital supervisors at Kindred Hospital in Mansfield. Last week, she hung a three-by-five foot American flag in the office she shares with the other supervisors.

When McLucas came to work Friday, her boss told her another supervisor had found her flag offensive. "I was just totally speechless. I was like, 'You're kidding me,'" McLucas said.

McLucas' husband and sons are former military men. Her daughter is currently serving in Iraq as a combat medic.

Stifling a cry, McLucas said, "I just wonder if all those young men and women over there are really doing this for nothing."

McLucas said the supervisor who complained has been in the United States for 14 years and is formerly from Africa. McLucas said the supervisor took down Debbie's flag herself.

"The flag and the pole had been placed on the floor," McLucas said. But McLucas also said hospital higher ups had told her some patients' families and visitors had also complained.

"I was told it wouldn't matter if it was only one person," she said. "It would have to come down."

McLucas said hospital bosses told her as far as patriotism was concerned, the flag flying outside the hospital building would have to suffice.

Kindred Hospital Corporate Headquarters are located in Kentucky. They have yet to make a final decision on the matter. They have not returned our phone calls for comment.

The Kindred Hospital Corporation was chosen as Fortune's most admired for 2009. McLucas hopes they'll back her patriotism.

"I find it very frightening because if I can't display my flag, what other freedoms will I lose before all is said and done," McLucas asked.

(© MMIX, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)
 

"I regret that I have but one life to lose for my country."Captain Nathan Hale, a 21-year old officer in the Continental Army, uttered those famous words upon his execution at the hands of British forces. http://keepthechangepalin2012.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

DEFINITIONS

A young boy went up to his father and asked him, Dad, "What is the difference between 'potentially' and 'realistically'?
The father thought for a moment, then answered, "Go ask your mother if she would sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars. Then ask your sister if she would sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars, and then, ask your brother if he'd sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars. Come back and tell me what you learn from that."

So the boy went to his mother and asked, "Would you sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?"
The mother replied, "Of course, I would! We could really use that money to fix up the house and send you kids to a great university!"

The boy went to his sister and asked, "Would you sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?"
The girl replied, "Oh, good heavens! I LOVE Brad Pitt and I would sleep with him in a heartbeat. Are you nuts?"

The boy went to his brother and asked, "Would you sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?"
"Of course," the brother replied. "Do you know how much a million bucks would buy?"

The boy pondered the answers for a few days and then went back to his dad.
His father asked him, "Did you find out the difference between 'potentially' and 'realistically'?"
The boy replied, "Yes, 'Potentially', you and I are sitting on three million dollars, but 'realistically', we're  living with two hookers and a future congressman."
NS

 

 

 

 



--- On Sat, 5/23/

 



 

 

 


On Memorial Day

 
My Friend,

Memorial Day On this Memorial Day, it is my great hope that you will take a few minutes of your time to reflect on what an honor it is to live in our great country and remember the men and women in our nation's armed services - those who are willing to give the ultimate sacrifice to protect our freedoms as Americans.

Last Friday, I had the great pleasure of spending time with the Midshipmen and their families at the commencement ceremony of the U.S. Naval Academy. These young men and women are a testament to what it means to serve a cause greater than self.

As we take a moment to remember those who have fallen in defense of our Nation, please keep all of our service men and women and each of our veterans in your thoughts and prayers today and every day.

Sincerely,

John McCain
Chair, Country First PAC




Paid for by Country First PAC
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee
www.CountryFirstPAC.com

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Office or the President


Dear Person who current holders the office of the President of the United States.
 
I will never call you President since you have yet to prove that you are qualified to be President of the United States Barry Hussein. I always faithful to the office but I will never respect. To say I say Fuck you.
 
 
To stay that we have lost our way fighting terrorist for the last eight years is sad. Its an insult to this country. Its an insult to those who have severed before me and those who will serve after me. You have insulted the victims of September 11Th, The U.S.S. Cole and the other who died in terror attacks unpond this nation. But mostly you have insulted me and the women who I was married to and was going to be the mother of my children, you see she died on that faithful day in September.
 
But by your words actions and policy you don't give a dam. You appear that you want more Americans to die. 1/20/2009 was the worst day in this nations history. I'm grateful to the men and women of our intelligence services and my brothers and sister's in arms who keep this nation safe. Because I know you don't give a dam about this country. You are a worthless piece of shit.
 
God Bless
 
M Walker USMC
 

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Matt Damonnnnnnnnnn

  ● Matt Damon has a new Jason Bourne movie coming out. Matt Damon plays a CIA agent who Tells Nancy Pelosi about waterboarding. But it's Pelosi who gets amnesia in this one. 
 

ARNT YOU GLAD AMERICAN GOT CHANGE NOT

Iran tests missile with range that can hit Israel

This image made from television broadcast Wednesday, May 20, 2009 by the Iranian AP – This image made from television broadcast Wednesday, May 20, 2009 by the Iranian television station, …

TEHRAN, Iran – Iran test-fired a missile capable of striking Israel, U.S. Mideast bases and Europe on Wednesday — a show of strength touted by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as he battles for re-election next month against more moderate opponents.

The U.S. responded by saying Iran must choose between destabilizing the Middle East or accepting the dialogue offered by President Barack Obama. The U.S. leader threatened earlier this week that Iran could face further international sanctions if it does not respond positively by year-end to U.S. attempts to open negotiations on its nuclear program.

Israel said the test appeared to be Iran's response to a positive meeting on Monday between Obama and new Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

U.S. officials confirmed the launch and Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said in Washington that Iran is at a crossroads and must choose its course.

"They can either continue on this path of continued destabilization in the region or they can decide that they want to pursue relationships with the counties in the region and the United States that are more normalized," said Whitman. "Our concerns are obviously based on nuclear ambitions and the implications that long- and medium-range missiles have with respect to that," he added.

Alex Vatanka, a senior Middle East analyst at Jane's Information Group, said the test "does not change the strategic equation" in the region because Iran has had the ballistic missile capability to hit Israel and much of the Middle East for more than a decade with its Shahab missiles.

It was likely intended to send a message to the Obama administration that Iran cannot be bullied into talks and also to show the country's strength in hopes that would boost Ahmadinejad's popularity among voters in the June 12 election, Vatanka said.

Iran says its missile program is merely for defense and its space program is for scientific and surveillance purposes. It maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian energy uses only.

Tehran said the solid-fuel Sajjil-2 surface-to-surface missile has a range of about 1,200 miles. It is a new version of the Sajjil missile, which the country said it successfully tested late last year and has a similar range. Many analysts said the launch of the solid-fuel Sajjil was significant because such missiles are more accurate than liquid fuel missiles of similar range, such as Iran's Shahab-3.

"Defense Minister (Mostafa Mohammad Najjar) has informed me that the Sajjil-2 missile, which has very advanced technology, was launched from Semnan and it landed precisely on the target," state radio quoted Ahmadinejad as saying. He did not name any targets for the missile when he spoke during a visit to the city of Semnan, 125 miles east of the capital Tehran, where Iran's space program is centered.

Italy said its foreign minister, Franco Frattini, canceled a planned trip to Iran on Wednesday because Ahmadinejad wanted to meet in Semnan rather than in Tehran.

Najjar said the Sajjil-2 differs from the Sajjil missile because it "is equipped with a new navigation system as well as precise and sophisticated sensors," according to Iran's official news agency.

Sajjil means "baked clay." It is a reference to a story in the Quran, Islam's holy book, in which birds sent by God drive off an enemy army attacking the holy city of Mecca by pelting them with stones of baked clay.

Two U.S. officials confirmed the missile launch, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the record.

"It appears the test was a success," one official said. "It appears they launched a medium-range missile."

After the test, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned that if Iran manages to produce nuclear weapons, it would "spark an arms race" in the Middle East.

Iran's nuclear and missile programs have alarmed Israel. Prime Minister Netanyahu pressed Obama to step up pressure on Tehran when the two met in Washington on Monday.

Moshe Arens, a former Israeli defense minister who trained in the U.S. as an aerospace engineer, said Wednesday's test was apparently part of Iran's broader quest to develop more advanced missiles and nuclear capability.

"They're increasing their abilities to launch rockets of longer and longer range that go beyond Israel and into Europe and eventually will carry nuclear weapons," he said. "They're troublemakers and you have to deal with troublemakers."

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly called for Israel's elimination, and the Jewish state has not ruled out a military strike to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat. The Israeli government has been skeptical of U.S. overtures to Iran, which have received a mixed response from Ahmadinejad.

Many Western experts have expressed skepticism about Iran's professed military achievements, saying the country provides no transparency to verify its claims. Most believe Iran does not yet have the technology to produce nuclear weapons, including warheads for long-range missiles.

The U.S. released an intelligence report about 18 months ago that said Iran abandoned a secret nuclear weapons program in 2003 under international pressure and has not restarted it.

Israel and several other countries have disputed the finding. But many in the West at least agree that Iran is seeking to develop the capability to develop weapons at some point. A group of U.S. and Russian scientists said in a report issued Tuesday that Iran could produce a simple nuclear device in one to three years and a nuclear warhead in another five years after that.

The study published by the nonpartisan EastWest Institute also said Iran is making advances in rocket technology and could develop a ballistic missile capable of firing a 2,200-pound nuclear warhead up to 1,200 miles "in perhaps six to eight years."

After the testing of the Sajjil in November, a senior U.S. military official said Washington believed Iran was testing the first stage of what would be a two-stage rocket. Multiple stages allow long-range missiles to use less fuel.

The launch came just weeks before the vote that could influence Iran's response to the U.S. outreach. Two of the three candidates approved by Iran's constitutional watchdog to run in the June election are reformists who favor improving ties with the West.

The hard-line president has been criticized by his opponents and others for antagonizing the U.S. and mismanaging the country's faltering economy. On Wednesday, the constitutional watchdog approved three candidates to challenge Ahmadinejad, setting up a showdown between reformists and hard-liners.