Subject: Is Dhimmitude Important To America? (Define & Decide For Yourself)
I had never heard the word until now---
Type it into Google and start reading. Pretty interesting....
Word of the Day: Dhimmitude
Click here: Dhimmitude - Google Search
Dhimmitude (pronounced Zim'i-tude) is the Muslim system of controlling non-Muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to Islam.
Here's a paraphrased hint:
(Use whatever words suit you)
The ObamaCare bill is the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia Muslim diktat in the United States . Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be "gambling", "risk-taking" and "usury" and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this. How convenient. So I, Ann Barnhardt, a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivables, and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance. Non-Muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize Muslims. Period. This is Dhimmitude.
Dhimmitude serves two purposes: it enriches the Muslim masters AND serves to drive conversions to Islam. In this case, the incentive to convert to Islam will be taken up by those in the inner-cities as well as the godless Generation X, Y and Z types who have no moral anchor. If you don't believe in Christ to begin with, it is no problem whatsoever to sell Him for 30 pieces of silver. "Sure, I'll be a Muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes. Where do I sign, bro?"
I recommend sending this post to your contacts. This is desperately important and people need to know about it - quickly.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Is Dhimmitude Important To America? (Define & Decide For Yourself)
Fw: Fwd: Answer
A Real Eye Opener
WHY is the USA BANKRUPT?
Informative, and mind boggling!
You think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this:
Boy, was I confused. I have been hammered with the propaganda that it is the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.
I now find that to be RIDICULOUS.
I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again. I also have included the URL's for verification of all the following facts...
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.
Verify at: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt..0.HTML
5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.CNN.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.
Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML
9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSC%20RI%20PTS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .
Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn/..com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML%C2%A0
13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.
Verify at: http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm
14.. 'The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One million sex crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'
Verify at: http: // www.drdsk.com/articleshtml %20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml
![]()
The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00 WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.
Are we THAT stupid? YES, FOR LETTING THOSE IN THE U.S.CONGRESS GET AWAY WITH LETTING THIS HAPPEN YEAR AFTER YEAR!!!!!
If this doesn't bother you then just delete the message. If, on the other hand, it does raise the hair on the back of your neck, I hope you forward it to every legal resident in the United StatesAND PLEASE REMEMBER IT AT THE NEXT ELECTIONS!!!
Fw: Fwd: History of the world; the Short version:
----- Forwarded Message ----
Sent: Sat, April 24, 2010 8:08:50 AM
Subject: Fwd: History of the world; the Short version:
History of the world; the Short version:
For those that don't know about history ... here is a condensed version:
Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/ gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
1 . Liberals, and
2. Conservatives.
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement . . .
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.
Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. Those became known as girlie-men. Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fareAnother interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.
Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, engineers, corporate executives, athletes, members of the military, airline pilots and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans . . . That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.
Here ends today's lesson in world history:
It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it.
A Conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to tee them off.
And there you have it! Let your next action reveal your true self .J
Fw: Fwd: America
From: ken kropacek <kropacek@yahoo.com>
To: cpthookis@yahoo.com; stankan@chapman.edu; granpat8@yahoo.com; wildojim@aol.com; maimperl@yahoo.com
Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 2:45:20 PM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: America
--- On Sat, 4/24/10, john kovas <lives9meow@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
Monday, April 26, 2010
Proof The New AZ Law is constitutional.
No, That Arizona Law Doesn't Create a Gestapo Dragnet
The law requires an otherwise-justifiable stop/detention before the provision about checking papers on a "reasonable suspicion" of illegal status kicks in.
The law requires police to check with federal authorities on a person's immigration status, if officers have stopped that person for some legitimate reason and come to suspect that he or she might be in the U.S. illegally. The heart of the law is this provision: "For any lawful contact made by a law enforcement official or a law enforcement agency…where reasonable suspicion exists that the person is an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States, a reasonable attempt shall be made, when practicable, to determine the immigration status of the person…"
Critics have focused on the term "reasonable suspicion" to suggest that the law would give police the power to pick anyone out of a crowd for any reason and force them to prove they are in the U.S. legally. Some foresee mass civil rights violations targeting Hispanics.
What fewer people have noticed is the phrase "lawful contact," which defines what must be going on before police even think about checking immigration status. "That means the officer is already engaged in some detention of an individual because he's violated some other law," says Kris Kobach, a University of Missouri Kansas City Law School professor who helped draft the measure. "The most likely context where this law would come into play is a traffic stop."
As far as "reasonable suspicion" is concerned, there is a great deal of case law dealing with the idea, but in immigration matters, it means a combination of circumstances that, taken together, cause the officer to suspect lawbreaking. It's not race -- Arizona's new law specifically says race and ethnicity cannot be the sole factors in determining a reasonable suspicion.
Kris Kobach, a law school professor and former advisor to Attorney General John Ashcroft on immigration matters, says, "The bill was drafted in expectation that the open-borders crowd would almost certainly bring a lawsuit. It's drafted to withstand judicial scrutiny."
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Why AZ's New Law is not Racial Profiling as Obama and his liberal friends want you to beleieve
Two illegal aliens charged with murder of South Carolina man
Odilon Iglesias Bello
Lexington County Sheriff's Office
On Wednesday, Lexington County sheriff's detectives arrested Erik Ponce Cruz, 23, and Odilon Iglesias Bello, 29, for the murder of William Lee "Willie" Adams, 41, who was stabbed to death on the front porch of his West Columbia home a few days earlier.
According to Lexington County Sheriff James Metts, Adams was acquainted with both men. Adams died from a stab wound to his abdomen with a butcher knife, the fatal stabbing allegedly followed am argument at Adams' home over money.
A third man, Clayton Clark, 52, has been arrested for lying to police, after initially telling detectives he did not know how Adams was killed, as he was not present. Clark later recanted that claim and identified the two illegal aliens as Adam's assailants.
Both Cruz and Bello are Mexican nationals, Immigration and Customs Enforcement have been notified of their illegal status and are currently being held without bond in the Lexington County Detention Center.
A few facts on criminal aliens:
-95 percent of homicide warrants in Los Angeles are issued for illegal aliens. Additionally, 67 percent of the 17,000 outstanding fugitive felony warrants in that city are issued for illegal aliens.
-83 percent of homicide warrants in Phoenix are issued for illegal aliens.
-86 percent of homicide warrants issued in Albuquerque, New Mexico are issued for illegal aliens.
-In Operation Predator, ICE arrested and deported 6,085 illegal alien pedophiles. There have been many studies which suggest that each pedophile molests and average of 148 children over their lifetime. Considering that estimate, the deportees alone could have accounted for 900,580 victims.
-29 percent of the U.S. prison population is comprised of illegal aliens, at an annual cost to the American taxpayers of more than $1.6 billion.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Senoir Citizens rab a bank whats next
death threats against the evl speaker the FBI arrest people. Death threats against NJ REPUBLIC GOV its a joke
Union Memo Hints At Gov.'s Death
Teachers Union's Memo The Latest Salvo In War Of Words With Gov. Christie
HACKENSACK, N.J. (CBS) ―Related Slideshows
Related Stories
- Privatization Effort Advancing In NJ
(4/6/2010) - Some NJ School Bosses Sharing Pain Of Aid Cuts
(4/4/2010) - N.J. Power Brokers Rip Obama Drilling Plan
(4/1/2010) - Christie Goes To War With NJ Teachers Over Wages
(3/31/2010)
The memo is the latest salvo in a war of words between Christie and the union over wage and benefits concessions.
The Record of Bergen County obtained the Bergen County Education Association memo that includes a closing prayer:
"Dear Lord this year you have taken away my favorite actor, Patrick Swayze, my favorite actress, Farrah Fawcett, my favorite singer, Michael Jackson, and my favorite salesman, Billy Mays. I just wanted to let you know that Chris Christie is my favorite governor."
Stay Updated: Download CBS2's Free iPhone App Now! Association president Joe Coppola says the "prayer" was a joke and was never meant to be made public.
Christie spokesman Michael Drewniak says there's nothing professional about the group.
Meanwhile, Drewniak says the governor is also considering reopening union contracts to try to get salary concessions at the institutes of higher learning.
Unionized employees at the schools deferred a 3.5 percent increase last year when former Gov. Jon Corzine reopened their contracts.
College and university officials are considering cuts to staff and programs to offset a $173 million cut to higher education in Christie's proposed budget.
On Tuesday, Christie extended a deadline for school districts to receive additional state aide in exchange for teachers agreeing to wage freezes.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Look what he is reading!
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2790 - Release Date: 04/04/10 13:31:00
Fw: Stop Reid's Extreme Left Wing Agenda
From: Socialism Alerts <replies@socialismalerts.com>
To: maimperl@yahoo.com
Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 1:06:42 AM
Subject: Stop Reid's Extreme Left Wing Agenda
![]() Stop Reid's Extreme Left Wing Agenda ALERT: Senator Harry Reid is the Senate Majority Leader and is the Democrat's chief legislative strategist for the socialist agenda of expanding big government, raising your taxes and forcing America permanently to the extreme left.
Did you know that since Obama was elected President in 2009 Reid used his position in the Senate to:
Have you had ENOUGH yet?
A Reid agenda In The Senate Session For 2010 Can Only Get Worse. Here is a sneak preview of what Reid has in store as being part of his Socialist agenda.
We must stop Harry Reid and his agenda now. And we must defeat him in his reelection bid this year. Will you help us do it? Are you with us? We must take the message, the truth about his policies and their impact to the voters in Nevada and the rest of America. Create a storm of public opinion that will slow Reid down and then defeat him. Here Is The Political Impact Of Defeating Harry Reid. Harry Reid is the leader for the liberal agenda in the Senate. His defeat would cause other liberals to have second thoughts about their political future. They would see that leading their agenda comes with a heavy political price - electoral defeat. It would serve as a lesson and a deterrent. It would set back their agenda far more than the loss of just one Senator. Harry Reid has had a very liberal voting record for years, but as leader, it has come to the public's attention more now than ever. I intend to wrap that record around his neck like a piece of jewelry, so he can't escape, evade or explain it, so that it becomes an anchor that drags him down to defeat. Now, I know some of you are probably saying, well, Reid is in Nevada, and I don't vote there, and he is their problem. I can't do anything about him. Well as leader of the Majority party in the Senate and the one responsible for moving their agenda, Reid has an impact on every single American. Every one of you will pay more taxes, have your health care ruined, have your jobs put in jeopardy if Reid is allowed to continue pushing his liberal agenda. TAKE ACTION: The November 2010 elections are national not just local. Republican Scott Brown's election in MA changed the entire balance of power in the Senate. So Obama, Reid, Pelosi and the Democrat majority used bribes, lies, tricks, threats and the new national policy of mass political destruction to pollute America with the foul stench of Obama's brand of political change. Obama you can keep that change we do not want it. After Scott Brown's election many people said they wished they could have voted for him but they did not live in MA. So what can we do? It's really very simple. We replace those big government politicians! How do we do it? By supporting conservative Republican candidates on a national scale with the support they need from Americans like you. You can vote in every state and every election by helping AmeriPAC send support where it is needed. AmeriPAC's national effort to stop the destructive power grabs of ObamaCare must now be directed at the November elections. You sent millions of faxes to Congress and they refused to listen. Now WE MUST NOT STOP - WE CANNOT STOP AND GIVE INTO THE CORRUPTION. We need you to donate regularly every week or month with the same commitment to candidates that are listening and help AmeriPAC give the maximum support we can to every candidate that will pledge to take back America. This is a fight for the very heart of America. We can WIN this fight by keeping the Democrats from getting the votes they need to pass their socialist agenda... but we can't do it without YOUR help!
BE ENCOURAGED -- remember that the majority of the American people are WITH US. With every passing day, more and more citizens -- left AND right -- are expressing their opposition and outrage Obama and Reid. -- WE CAN'T GIVE UP NOW! We CANNOT let the radical liberals in Congress -- and the White House -- force their extreme leftwing liberal plan on the American people! That's why were running a campaign to Retire Reid This fight CAN BE WON! Please, take action right away to Retire Reid NOW! Sincerely, ![]() Alan M. Gottlieb Chairman, AmeriPAC www.AmeriPac.org
Please make checks payable to AmeriPAC: American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC) PO Box 1682 Dept Code 4018 Bellevue, WA 98009-1682 Paid for by AmeriPAC, a federally-authorized and qualified multicandidate political action committee. Contributions to AmeriPAC will be used in connection with federal elections. Maximum contribution per individual per calendar year is $5,000. Contributions from foreign nationals and corporations are prohibited. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes. |
Forward This Message To A Friend
This message was intended for: maimperl@yahoo.com
You were added to the system September 2, 2009. For more information
click here.
Update your preferences | Unsubscribe
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document
WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama's advisers will remove religious terms such as "Islamic extremism" from the central document outlining the U.S. national security strategy and will use the rewritten document to emphasize that the United States does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terror, counterterrorism officials said.
The change is a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventative war and currently states: "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century."
The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document still was being written, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document will be the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, like his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.
The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the United States talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.
That shift away from terrorism has been building for a year, since Obama went to Cairo, Egypt, and promised a "new beginning" in the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world. The White House believes the previous administration based that relationship entirely on fighting terror and winning the war of ideas.
"You take a country where the overwhelming majority are not going to become terrorists, and you go in and say, 'We're building you a hospital so you don't become terrorists.' That doesn't make much sense," said National Security Council staffer Pradeep Ramamurthy.
Ramamurthy runs the administration's Global Engagement Directorate, a four-person National Security Council team that Obama launched last May with little fanfare and a vague mission to use diplomacy and outreach "in pursuit of a host of national security objectives."
Since then, the division has not only helped change the vocabulary of fighting terror but also has shaped the way the country invests in Muslim businesses, studies global warming, supports scientific research and combats polio.
Before diplomats go abroad, they hear from the Ramamurthy or his deputy, Jenny Urizar. When officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration returned from Indonesia, the NSC got a rundown about research opportunities on global warming.
Ramamurthy maintains a database of interviews conducted by 50 U.S. embassies worldwide. And business leaders from more than 40 countries head to Washington this month for an "entrepreneurship summit" for Muslim businesses.
"Do you want to think about the U.S. as the nation that fights terrorism or the nation you want to do business with?" Ramamurthy said.
To deliver that message, Obama's speechwriters have taken inspiration from an unlikely source: former President Ronald Reagan. Visiting communist China in 1984, Reagan spoke to Fudan University in Shanghai about education, space exploration and scientific research.
He discussed freedom and liberty. He never mentioned communism or democracy.
"They didn't look up to the U.S. because we hated communism," said Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, Obama's foreign policy speechwriter.
Like Reagan in China, Obama in Cairo made only passing references to terrorism. Instead he focused on cooperation. He announced the United States would team up to fight polio with the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, a multinational body based in Saudi Arabia.
The United States and the OIC had worked together before, but never with that focus.
"President Obama saw it as an opportunity to say, `We work on things far beyond the war on terrorism,"' said World Health Organization spokeswoman Sona Bari.
Polio is endemic in three Muslim countries -- Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan -- but some Muslim leaders have been suspicious of vaccination efforts, which they believed to be part of a CIA sterilization campaign. Last year, the OIC and religious scholars at the International Islamic Fiqh Academy issued a fatwa, or religious decree, that parents should have their children vaccinated.
"We're probably entering into a whole new level of engagement between the OIC and the polio program because of the stimulus coming from the U.S. government," said Michael Galway, who works on polio eradication for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Centers for Disease Control also began working more closely with local Islamic leaders in northern Nigeria, a network that had been overlooked for years, said John Fitzsimmons, the deputy director of the CDC's immunization division.
Though health officials are reluctant to assign credit to any one action, new polio cases in Nigeria fell from 83 during the first quarter of last year to just one so far this year, Fitzsimmons said.
Public opinion polls also showed consistent improvement in U.S. sentiment within the Muslim world last year, although the viewpoints are still overwhelmingly negative, however.
Obama did not invent Muslim outreach. President George W. Bush gave the White House its first Quran, hosted its first Iftar dinner to celebrate Ramadan, and loudly stated support for Muslim democracies like Turkey.
But the Bush administration struggled with its rhetoric. Muslims criticized him for describing the war against terror as a "crusade" and labeling the invasion of Afghanistan "Operation Infinite Justice" -- words that were seen as religious. He regularly identified America's enemy as "Islamic extremists" and "radical jihadists."
Karen Hughes, a Bush confidant who served as his top diplomat to the Muslim world in his second term, urged the White House to stop.
"I did recommend that, in my judgment, it's unfortunate because of the way it's heard. We ought to avoid the language of religion," Hughes said. "Whenever they hear 'Islamic extremism, Islamic jihad, Islamic fundamentalism,' they perceive it as a sort of an attack on their faith. That's the world view Osama bin Laden wants them to have."
Hughes and Juan Zarate, Bush's former deputy national security adviser, said Obama's efforts build on groundwork from Bush's second term, when some of the rhetoric softened. But by then, Zarate said, it was overshadowed by the Guantanamo Bay detention center, the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison and a prolonged Iraq war.
"In some ways, it didn't matter what the president did or said. People weren't going to be listening to him in the way we wanted them to," Zarate said. "The difference is, President Obama had a fresh start."
Obama's foreign policy posture is not without political risk. Even as Obama steps up airstrikes on terrorists abroad, he has proven vulnerable to Republican criticism on security issues at home, such as the failed Christmas Day airline bombing and the announced-then-withdrawn plan to prosecute 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York.
Peter Feaver, a Duke University political scientist and former Bush adviser, is skeptical of Obama's engagement effort. It "doesn't appear to have created much in the way of strategic benefit" in the Middle East peace process or in negotiations over Iran's nuclear ambitions, he said.
Obama runs the political risk of seeming to adopt politically correct rhetoric abroad while appearing tone deaf on national security issues at home, Feaver said.
The White House dismisses such criticism. In June, Obama will travel to Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, and is expected to revisit many of the themes of his Cairo speech.
"This is the long-range direction we need to go in," Ramamurthy said.
-
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Please login or register below.
or login using a third-party account
Not a member yet?
Register Now
On FOXNews.comIt's FREE and only takes a minute!
Get access to:
- Breaking news and access to video and infographics
- Exclusive FOXNews blogs and community features
- Channel info and more!















Subscribe to Comments