--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Infidels Are Cool <admin@infidelsarecool.com> wrote:
From: Infidels Are Cool <admin@infidelsarecool.com>
Subject: Infidels Are Cool
To: maimperl@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2008, 8:22 AM
| |  | | American flag disappears from Obama campaign jet Posted: 22 Jul 2008 02:11 AM CDT But don't call him unpatriotic… WorldNetDaily  As part of a month-long aircraft makeover, a painted American flag was removed from the tail of Sen. Barack Obama's official campaign airplane and was replaced with the presidential candidate's trademark "O" symbol.
The refurbished 757 was unveiled to members of the news media today, 41 of whom boarded the craft and took off to meet Obama in Amman, Jordan, where the presidential candidate will stop as part of a Middle Eastern and European tour. Obama traveled to the Mideast earlier this week on board a separate airplane. Fox News blogger Bonny Kapp, traveling on Obama's new airplane, reported: "The North American jet that flew Obama and his traveling crew around for much of the primary season was refurbished with new seats and power for each passenger a must on the campaign trail. And the plane that once had an American flag on its tail now sports the Obama 'O.'" ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Video: Anti-war leftist spits on Iraq War Vet Posted: 22 Jul 2008 01:49 AM CDT  This is video of a recent protest that took place in downtown Santa Barbara where the UC Santa Barbara College Republicans decided to stop by and record the anti-American garbage that can usually be assumed from events like this.
At the 6:20 mark, a war Vet from the UCSB college Republicans gets spit on by some an anti-war protester. Not just that, but the obvious hatred for America is so obvious. Check this out: ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Rail Inspector Beaten Savagely by Arabs Posted: 21 Jul 2008 08:24 PM CDT A group of young Arabs savagely beat an Israeli railroad worker as he manned his guard post. (IsraelNN.com) An Israel Railways employee was beaten Thursday by a group of Arab youths. Ronen, a rail inspector for the national carrier, reported that a group of young Arabs confronted him at his guard post at a railway crossing near Atlit, demanded his weapon, and savagely beat him when they discovered he was unarmed. Ronen can barely speak, as the attackers fractured bones in his face and body. Ronen's parents, speaking to police on behalf of their son, conveyed Ronen's account of the attack, as well as their horror at the result: "I arrived at the post and saw that it was full of blood," Ronen's father said. "I was certain my son had been murdered." The attack is believed to be "nationalistically" motivated, which would define it as an act of terrorism. Nationalistic motivations for attacks on Jews? Where have I heard of that before? Oh yeah, with the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei a.k.a the Nazis… ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Man says will wait to consummate marriage with 10-year-old Hail girl Posted: 21 Jul 2008 07:06 PM CDT How civilized. He will wait until she is 15, and he is 69. HAIL: In the latest twist to a high-profile marriage in this central Saudi city, a 64-year-old man has announced that he would wait five years to consummate his marriage with his 10-year-old bride. According to local newspapers yesterday, the man — who has already paid a SR100,000 dowry to the father of the girl and signed the marriage contract — now says he would wait until the girl is 15 to complete the marriage. Explaining the circumstances that led to the marriage, the man's son said his father never had a second wife. He said the girl's father taunted his father saying he was willing to marry his daughter to him if he paid SR100,000 in dowry. "My father accepted the challenge, paid the money and became the husband of the young woman," the son was quoted as saying. Following reports of child marriages in the local media, religious scholars and human rights activists in the Kingdom have demanded legislation to set a statutory minimum age for marriage. According to the Shariah, maturity is associated with puberty, which could start at the age of nine for girls and at the age of 11 for boys. Just disgusting. The man is old enough to be her grandfather. But shariah law allows it, so if it was good enough for Mohammed, it is good enough for this sick individual. ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Terrorists' assignment: Protect Barack Obama Posted: 21 Jul 2008 05:49 PM CDT 'Maybe the Israelis will try something,' hints militant bodyguard Right. It's always the Israelis who blow themselves up in markets. It's always the Israelis kidnapping and holding people for ransom. It's always the Israelis calling for establishing a caliphate, and waging jihad against the unbelievers… JERUSALEM – Members of the most active West Bank terror organization are set to serve in security forces being deployed to protect Sen. Barack Obama during his trip to the West Bank tomorrow, WND has learned. Obama is due to visit Israeli officials in Jerusalem and leaders of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank city of Ramallah as part of a wider Middle Eastern and European tour that includes Jordan, France and Germany. According to security officials coordinating deployments of forces with the PA for Obama's Ramallah visit, members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's declared military wing, have been called upon by the PA to participate in the protection of Obama, particularly in securing the perimeter during a scheduled meeting with PA President Mahmoud Abbas. The Brigades is listed as a terror organization by the U.S. State Department. The group took credit along with the Islamic Jihad terror organization for every suicide bombing in Israel between 2005 and 2006 and is responsible for thousands of shootings and rocket firings. Statistically, the Al Aqsa Brigades perpetuated more terrorism from the West Bank than Hamas, according to the Israeli Defense Forces. Brigades leaders, speaking to WND on condition of anonymity, confirmed they will participate in protecting Obama as official members of the PA's security forces. Many Brigades members, including the group's chiefs, serve openly in Fatah's Force 17 presidential guard units and the Palestinian Preventative Security Services; hundreds of Force 17 and Preventative officers are slated to secure Ramallah during Obama's visit there. The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades members are slated to serve in a third ring of security forces patrolling the periphery of Abbas' Ramallah compound during the Palestinian leader's meeting with Obama. The Israeli Defense Forces, working with U.S. security coordinators, will protect the main West Bank highway Obama's convoy will use to approach Ramallah. Security for Obama will be largely turned over to the Palestinians once he enters Ramallah, although security plans are being heavily coordinated with the U.S. Various high-profile Al Aqsa Brigades terrorists serve in Fatah's security forces, including those in Ramallah. The current chief of Fatah's Force 17, Abu Hayyet, is accused by Israel of planning or involvement in at least 10 deadly terror attacks, according to Israeli security officials. Abbas previously appointed senior Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades leader Mahmoud Damra as commander of Force 17, a major, U.S.-financed Fatah security force. Damra, who was arrested by Israel last November, was on the Jewish state's most-wanted list of terrorists. Read the rest on WND. ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Islamists launch PR "war" against Western Values Posted: 21 Jul 2008 03:46 PM CDT And yet imbeciles like Rowan Williams claim Christian doctrine is offensive.
Multiculturalism at its finest. It is no wonder Europe is declining.
RADICAL Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir has launched a campaign to stop young Muslims being corrupted by Western "liberal values".
The organisation, which Tony Blair wanted to ban in Britain, has planned a summer PR campaign against Western "attacks" on the religion. The move comes as Hizb ut-Tahrir's British arm slammed Government plans to combat Islamic extremism and to take on the preachers of hate. The group claims the Government is trying to build a compliant British Islam, and complains no other religion is subjected to such state interference. Under the Government plans, a panel of 20 Islamic experts will be set up to counter warped interpretations of the Koran and to advise youngsters on key Muslim issues and how "that fits in with being a citizen in the UK". Citizenship classes will also be held in mosque schools, or madrassas, but Hizb ut-Tahrir is intent on targeting Muslim youngsters to "empower themselves" with its summer Stand For Islam campaign. It claims young people in particular have been subject to an intense Islamophobic campaign and believes they are at greatest risk from the "corrupting" influence of Western liberalism, which it brands the cause of binge drinking, gun and knife crime, yob culture and teenage pregnancies. The group, which describes itself as a global Islamic political party, is banned in Germany where it is regarded as anti-semitic. In Britain, former Prime Minister Tony Blair wanted it banned but, after two reviews, no action was taken. The organisation insists it is not a conveyor belt to terrorism but British critics warn it plays a part in radicalising young Muslims to believe they cannot be both British and Muslim. Its campaign, focusing on such areas as Oldham, Manchester, Bradford and Leeds, carries the motto "Don't Sit And Take It". It claims attacks by politicians and media in the West are part of a campaign to present Islam as a backward, medieval religion. Don't sit and take it? I think that is the very thing politicians like Geert Wilders, Mike Huckabee and activists like Bridget Gabriel, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and others like them who are not cowed by threats from muslim terrorists and speak out about the threat are doing. They aren't taking it sitting down. Claiming these politicians paint islam as backwards and medieval is laughable, if not an outright lie. Perhaps the honor killings, kidnappings and beheadings, blowing up of buses, suicide bombers, blowing up subway tunnels, flying planes into buildings, dumping a man in a wheelchair off a cruise ship, shooting up schools full of children, and all the other "contributions" islam has given are what REALLY paint that picture for us. hat tip to the Daily Mail. ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Muslims Kill Christian Teenager For Courting Muslim Girl Posted: 21 Jul 2008 02:26 PM CDT A 19 year old Pakistani Christian was beaten to death by muslims, for courting a muslimah. LAHORE, PAKISTAN (BosNewsLife)– The body of a Christian teenager has been hauled out of a canal in Pakistan's second largest city Lahore after he was beaten to death there for courting a Muslim girl, BosNewsLife learned Friday, July 18.
The 19-year-old boy, whose name was changed into Peter for security reasons, was murdered by the girl's father and two uncles in what they described as an 'honour killing', Christian family members and investigators said. Peter and the 19-year-old girl apparently began their relationship through mobile phone chatting, an increasingly popular way of communicating among youngsters across Asia. Interfaith contacts and marriages between Christians and Muslims are allowed under Islamic law, but such relationships are often opposed by Islamic clerics and hard-line Muslims, according to religious rights investigators. The troubles for Peter apparently began when the girl's family forced her to call him and invite the boy to a secluded location. Peter reportedly immediately hired a motorbike to reach the area, but he would not find his girlfriend. Instead, her father and two uncles awaited the boy and allegedly beat him to death. PETER BY FORCE "They took Peter by force. They trussed him and tortured him for almost two days. Peter could not bear the severity of the torture and died eventually," said Joseph Francis, who leads rights group Center for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), which gives legal support to reportedly persecuted Christians in Pakistan. The Muslim family could not be reached for comment. CLAAS lawyers say police have so far rejected to register the case as murder and are describing it as suicide. "The police were prejudiced, because it was a matter of religion," Francis added. CLAAS made clear it would try to seek justice for Peter's family in a local court. "Sadly, all too often, Christians in Pakistan are treated as substandard citizens with few civil liberties under the law," the group said in a statement. "That prejudice is [reflected] by the obvious negative response by police. [We want] to see that [they are] impartial, regardless of religion." The group said it had urged supporters to "pray for Peter's family" and for "awareness" among to end "dividing human beings in different classes." CHAIRMAN CONDEMNS KILLING The chairman of Rays Of Development Organization (ROD), Ferhan Mazher, told BosNewsLife that his Pakistani human rights group has "condemned the killing of a Christian youth for merely talking to a Muslim girl on a cell phone." Mazher stressed that ROD is involved in efforts to "eradicate" the "honour killings" from Pakistan's society. "In Pakistan live people of diverse faiths…Honour killing is a menace for the country," He said ROD wants to help make Pakistan a country of "interfaith peace, love, tolerance and harmony." ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | NY Times rejects McCain editorial Posted: 21 Jul 2008 12:11 PM CDT Blatant bias. And they don't care because they have no reason to care about keeping their journalistic integrity that was lost years ago. NYT REJECTS MCCAIN'S EDITORIAL; SHOULD 'MIRROR' OBAMA
Mon Jul 21 2008 12:00:25 ET An editorial written by Republican presidential hopeful McCain has been rejected by the NEW YORK TIMES — less than a week after the paper published an essay written by Obama, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. The paper's decision to refuse McCain's direct rebuttal to Obama's 'My Plan for Iraq' has ignited explosive charges of media bias in top Republican circles. 'It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama's piece,' NYT Op-Ed editor David Shipley explained in an email late Friday to McCain's staff. 'I'm not going to be able to accept this piece as currently written.' As a courtesy to those who didn't get to read it, here it is in it's entirety via Drudge In January 2007, when General David Petraeus took command in Iraq, he called the situation "hard" but not "hopeless." Today, 18 months later, violence has fallen by up to 80% to the lowest levels in four years, and Sunni and Shiite terrorists are reeling from a string of defeats. The situation now is full of hope, but considerable hard work remains to consolidate our fragile gains. Progress has been due primarily to an increase in the number of troops and a change in their strategy. I was an early advocate of the surge at a time when it had few supporters in Washington. Senator Barack Obama was an equally vocal opponent. "I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there," he said on January 10, 2007. "In fact, I think it will do the reverse." Now Senator Obama has been forced to acknowledge that "our troops have performed brilliantly in lowering the level of violence." But he still denies that any political progress has resulted. Perhaps he is unaware that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has recently certified that, as one news article put it, "Iraq has met all but three of 18 original benchmarks set by Congress last year to measure security, political and economic progress." Even more heartening has been progress that's not measured by the benchmarks. More than 90,000 Iraqis, many of them Sunnis who once fought against the government, have signed up as Sons of Iraq to fight against the terrorists. Nor do they measure Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki's new-found willingness to crack down on Shiite extremists in Basra and Sadr City—actions that have done much to dispel suspicions of sectarianism. The success of the surge has not changed Senator Obama's determination to pull out all of our combat troops. All that has changed is his rationale. In a New York Times op-ed and a speech this week, he offered his "plan for Iraq" in advance of his first "fact finding" trip to that country in more than three years. It consisted of the same old proposal to pull all of our troops out within 16 months. In 2007 he wanted to withdraw because he thought the war was lost. If we had taken his advice, it would have been. Now he wants to withdraw because he thinks Iraqis no longer need our assistance. To make this point, he mangles the evidence. He makes it sound as if Prime Minister Maliki has endorsed the Obama timetable, when all he has said is that he would like a plan for the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops at some unspecified point in the future. Senator Obama is also misleading on the Iraqi military's readiness. The Iraqi Army will be equipped and trained by the middle of next year, but this does not, as Senator Obama suggests, mean that they will then be ready to secure their country without a good deal of help. The Iraqi Air Force, for one, still lags behind, and no modern army can operate without air cover. The Iraqis are also still learning how to conduct planning, logistics, command and control, communications, and other complicated functions needed to support frontline troops. No one favors a permanent U.S. presence, as Senator Obama charges. A partial withdrawal has already occurred with the departure of five "surge" brigades, and more withdrawals can take place as the security situation improves. As we draw down in Iraq, we can beef up our presence on other battlefields, such as Afghanistan, without fear of leaving a failed state behind. I have said that I expect to welcome home most of our troops from Iraq by the end of my first term in office, in 2013. But I have also said that any draw-downs must be based on a realistic assessment of conditions on the ground, not on an artificial timetable crafted for domestic political reasons. This is the crux of my disagreement with Senator Obama. Senator Obama has said that he would consult our commanders on the ground and Iraqi leaders, but he did no such thing before releasing his "plan for Iraq." Perhaps that's because he doesn't want to hear what they have to say. During the course of eight visits to Iraq, I have heard many times from our troops what Major General Jeffrey Hammond, commander of coalition forces in Baghdad, recently said: that leaving based on a timetable would be "very dangerous." The danger is that extremists supported by Al Qaeda and Iran could stage a comeback, as they have in the past when we've had too few troops in Iraq. Senator Obama seems to have learned nothing from recent history. I find it ironic that he is emulating the worst mistake of the Bush administration by waving the "Mission Accomplished" banner prematurely. I am also dismayed that he never talks about winning the war—only of ending it. But if we don't win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president. Instead I will continue implementing a proven counterinsurgency strategy not only in Iraq but also in Afghanistan with the goal of creating stable, secure, self-sustaining democratic allies.
---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | | Video: New McCain "pump" ad Posted: 21 Jul 2008 11:51 AM CDT ---
Related Articles at Infidels Are Cool:  | |
No comments:
Post a Comment